Quote Originally Posted by pvfan View Post
In all seriousness, does anybody think multiple schools on one site is a good idea?
After all the fussing, maneuvering, motions and counter motions from this meeting, the only thing the BOS could technically vote for or against was the funding. All the talk of "2 on 1", etc. is simply a request or suggestion and is not binding in any way upon the SB. The SB can now decide what plan is selected going forward with the now approved funding. Tonight's SB meeting should be another doozy.

In my opinion and probably most others, the multiple school on one site is by no means the "best solution", but it is a "doable" one. I believe most people would say "if it has to happen, they would rather have 3 separate schools on 3 neutral sites", but I doubt that will get done simply due to the additional costs involved.

This is just the beginning of the process folks. Tighten your seat belts and hang on. We are still in for a bumpy ride before all is said and done.